|
Table of contents:
| November 2010 |
Illegal agents: how to avoid them? |
| September 2010 |
Beware of illegal part-time maids! |
| July 2010 |
Additional requirements to hire Filipino domestic workers |
| January 2010 |
New conditions for the security bond |
| January 2010 |
Higher coverage for the medical costs |
|
November 2010
Illegal agents: How to avoid them?
|
The MOM has introduced this November a new law to raise penalties against unlicensed employment agencies. The new law makes it also an offense for employers to knowingly hire from an unlicensed agent. It is therefore important for prospective employers to know how to make the difference between legal and illegal agents.
The definition of an employment agent in Singapore is : any person who offers matching services between a prospective employer and candidates. However, to be allowed to work as an employment agent in Singapore, the person must apply for a license and hence be accredited by MOM.
An unlicensed agent is always an illegal agent and he/ she faces stiff penalties: a fine from 5000 to 80 000 SGD and jail up to 2 years.
The employer who has hired through the services of an illegal agent faces also penalties: a fine of 5000 SGD.
And the employment agency who processes documents and work permit is exposed to the same sanctions as the illegal agent: up to 80 000 SGD and 2 years in jail.
When looking for a domestic helper, don't expose yourself to any risk: always ask the agent to show his/her accreditation card with the license number and check on MOM's website if the number is registered. The repertory of accredited agencies with MOM can be found here.
|
September 2010:
Beware of illegal part-time maids!
|
Hiring an illegal part-time helper puts the employer at risk of facing heavy penalties: fined up to 15 000 SGD* and / or jailed for up to 12 months. Know how to avoid uncomfortable situation.
In 2009, about a hundred employers were fined between 1500 SGD and 18 000 SGD* for illegally employing a helper or for deploying their own helper. Most cases were full time in house domestic workers moonlighting for a few weekly hours in other households and presenting themselves as "freelance helpers".
The law is however very clear: one Foreign Domestic Worker for one employer as stated on the Work Permit, with absolutely no exception to this.
It means that it is strictly forbidden to all Foreign Domestic Workers (meaning all full time maids) to work part-time for another employer. Both herself, her unique employer stated on her Work Permit and the employer hiring her for part-time may face stiff penalties from MOM.
But it is also strictly forbidden for an employer to allow his / her helper to do part-time job in another household.
To avoid such misfortune, it is advisable to ask any freelance domestic helper applying for a part-time job to show her Pass: Singapore citizens, Permanent Residents, Employment Pass or Dependant Pass are allowed to work as part-time domestic helpers but NOT Work Permit holders. And even if she says that her employer "sponsors her and agrees with her doing freelance missions", you should not hire her.
And as an employer of a Foreign Domestic Worker (full time maid), you have the responsibility to ensure that she doesn't moonlight during her free time. Inform her of the risks for her: fine up to 5 000 GSD and / or jail up to 12 months and also being barred from ever working again in Singapore. And in case your domestic helper is caught moonlighting by MOM, you can't say that you didn't know since when you signed the security bond form, you have undertaken the responsibility of the surveillance of your helper...
* Both figures are cited by the Straits Times. The 18 000 SGD is probably the result of several infringements of the law and not only the illegal employment or deployment of a maid.
(from the Straits Times September 19th, 2010)
|
July 2010:
Additionnal requirement to hire Filipino Domestic Helpers
|
The Philipino government has recently amended its Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995 in order to improve the welfare and protection of Filipino migrant workers. Immigration screening has been stepped up and exiting the Philipines to work overseas is now tougher and strictly controlled.
To exit the Philippines, a newly hired domestic helper is required to produce a standard employment contract verified by the Philippine Overseas Labour Office (Polo) and authenticated by the Embassy of the Philippines in Singapore. Each page of the contract should be signed by both employer and employee. Without this document, the domestic helper will be denied exiting the Philippines even though she has all the required documentation to clear the immigration in Singapore (valid work permit or "In-Principle Approval" letter from MOM). A template of the standard employment contract of the Philippines, so called the "Polo contract" can be found on the website of the embassy of the Philippines. A pdf file is also downloadable here.
What is in the Polo contract?
The standard employment filipino contract is different from the standard employment contract of the AEAS on the following points:
- there is a minimum salary of 600 SGD or 400 USD (though the currency conversion is not 600/400 as at september 2010),
- the employee must have 1 rest day per week,
- the employee must be given 15 calendar days of vacation with full pay for every year of service upon completion of contract,
- the employee must have separate living quarters,
- the employer must provide free emergency dental services (on top of emergency medical service),
- the employer must provide free round trip ecnomy class air ticket upon renewal of contract,
- in case of early termination of contract following a fault of the employee or due to force majeur , the employer is not obliged to pay for the return ticket.
The pitfalls of the Polo contract
The validity in Singapore of the above points is questionned: point 7 is illegal in Singapore, points 4 to 6 go beyond the Singapore legislation and regarding points 1 to 3, Singapore has no minium wage policy, neither off day policy, nor a paid leave policy for domestic helpers.
The Filipino community of dometic helpers in Singapore as well as NGOs, maid agencies and Singaporean employers have expressed their concern about this new rule. On August 29th 2010, the Straits Times reported the following precisions:
- "The Polo contract cannot be enforced in Singapore. It comes down to national sovereignty. Singapore has its rules" stated John Gee, the president of TWC2, an advocacy group for migrant workers.
- A spokesman for MOM added that when requirements imposed by a foreign government or embassy fall outside the local regulatory framework, "employers have to decide if they can meet these conditions when recruiting".
- Employment agencies are free to offer salaries consistent with the local market since Singapore has no minimum wage policy for foreign domestic workers.
- The contract between employer and employee is a private matter.
The consequences of the Polo contract
The Polo contract imposes additionnal procedure when hiring a Flipino domestic worker thus making it much longer to get the helper enter Singapore, about one month when it used to be about a week only.
Employers in Singapore cannot hire directly a newcomer anymore. They are required to go through an agency accredited by the Embassy of the Philippines to get the Polo contract verified and authenticated. The list of accredited agencies can be found on the website of the Embassy and can also be downloaded as a pdf file here.
Other sourcing countries for recruitmenet are being considered: members of the management committee of the AEAS (Association of Employment Agencies in Singapore) are eying Bangladesh, an approved source country for maids, at the detriment of the Philippines whose tightened laws make it too troublesome for the local market (Straits Times, 2 September 2010).
| Since January 1st, 2010 : New conditions for the Security Bond |
The Ministry of Manpower has reviewed the obligations placed on employers of Foreign Domestic Workers. Since January 1st, 2010, the 5000 SGD security bond will be forfeited upon the following circumstances:
- When the Employer does not ensure proper upkeep and maintenance of the Foreign Domestic Worker (which means prompt payment of salary, provision of adequate food and medical treatment, provision of acceptable housing, payment of the cost of repatriation) Afin de mieux protéger les droits des employées, le MOM modifie les règles de recouvrement du « Security Bond » ou caution de sécurité. Désormais, les 5000 SGD seront réclamés à l’employeur en cas de mauvais traitement définis comme : retard de paiement de salaire, alimentation inadaptée, logement inacceptable, insuffisance de soins médicaux, refus de financer le billet de retour au pays.
- When the Employer fails to cancel the Work Permit of the Domestic Helper upon termination of her contract;
- When the Employer fails to report to the MOM that the Employee has breached the Work Permit conditions (such as doing part-time);
- When the Employee engages in any form of employment other than a Domestic Helper with the Employer mentioned on her work permit (doing part-time with a work permit is illegal);
In case the Employee absconds, only half of the Security bond will be forfeited so long as the Employer can demonstrate he/ she has taken reasonable steps to locate the Employee.
Also, the Security bond won’t be forfeited anymore if the Foreign Domestic Worker becomes pregnant, marries a Singaporean or a permanent resident, fails to take 6-monthly medical examination, or engage in any activity detrimental to the security and well-being of Singapore. But these facts remain breaches of work permit conditions for which the Foreign Worker can be repatriated.
| Since January 1st: higher coverage for medical costs |
The Ministry of Manpower increases the annual medical coverage from 5000 SGD to 15 000 SGD.
Up to now, 10% of hospital bills incurred by Foreign Workers exceed the 5000 SGD limit. And an average bill for a maid who ends up in hospital is of 10 000 SGD.
The new 15 000 SGD minimum coverage “is likely to reduce those instances of employers dispatching sick maids home to avoid having to foot doctors’ bills” (Straits Times, September 26th 2009).
|